The “QuitGPT” movement emerges in response to the overt support of certain tech company leaders, notably that of Greg Brockman, co-founder of OpenAI, for Donald Trump. In January 2025, this movement urged citizens to disengage from the use of ChatGPT, a controversial artificial intelligence platform, and to explore alternatives deemed more ethical. This article examines the origins of the campaign, its motivations, and the possible consequences for the technological ecosystem.
The Origins of “QuitGPT”
In September 2025, Greg Brockman, president of OpenAI, made headlines by donating 25 million dollars to Donald Trump‘s campaign. This gesture sent shockwaves through the tech community and among ChatGPT users, who quickly called for a boycott. The campaign, dubbed “QuitGPT”, gained notoriety thanks to influential figures like actor Mark Ruffalo, who condemned these actions on social media.
The Motivation Behind the Boycott
The movement is not limited to a reaction to financial support for Trump. The initiators of QuitGPT emphasize broader concerns regarding the political and ethical implications of using ChatGPT. Critics argue that the tool is directly linked to controversial institutions such as ICE, raising questions about its use in contexts that may violate human rights.
A Call for Collective Action
On social media and in forums, users express their willingness to boycott ChatGPT and explore alternatives. The QuitGPT collective calls for mass unsubscribing from OpenAI’s services. This demonstrates that beyond ethical concerns, users also seek to establish a movement that could encourage other companies to adopt more responsible practices.
The Consequences for OpenAI
Technology experts, such as Théo Alves Da Costa, an artificial intelligence engineer, reveal that OpenAI could face economic challenges due to this boycott. The company, already known for its heavy debts, could be even more weakened if a significant number of users turn away from ChatGPT. The situation is particularly concerning, as OpenAI spends much more money than it currently generates.
Alternatives to the Flagship Chatbot
In the face of this boycott campaign, several alternatives to ChatGPT have emerged, such as Confer, Alpine, and Lumo. These options are presented as privacy-respecting and offering better ethical practices. Users are encouraged to explore these alternatives to diversify their technology choices.
Reactions and Debates Surrounding the Movement
The QuitGPT campaign does not have unanimous support. Some advocates for artificial intelligence argue that boycotting ChatGPT could have unintended consequences, especially for features that are beneficial in other contexts. The debates around the movement highlight deep tensions in the tech sector, where ethical, environmental, and social issues intersect.
Support for Donald Trump in the Tech Sector
It is crucial to note that the allegiance of certain tech companies to Trump is not an isolated case. Greg Brockman is the second-largest donor to Maga Inc., Trump’s political cell. Other tech figures, like Elon Musk, have also made significant donations, fueling criticism that there is an alarming trend within the industry.
Beyond the financial donations, these relationships raise questions about the political influence that tech companies can exert on society, and the QuitGPT movement seeks to highlight this reality.
