The major social platforms, initially seen as actors of progress and innovation, have recently found themselves at the center of heated debates concerning their influence on democracy. This analysis will explore the complex ties between these tech companies, their practices, and the impact they exert on public discourse and access to information. Between unexpected allegiances to certain political figures and regulatory issues, this article aims to shed light on the contemporary challenges related to these platforms.
Tech giants and their proximity to power
Tech companies have long been viewed as unyielding supporters of modern progressivism. However, their stance in the face of the rise of certain political leaders, such as Donald Trump, calls this image into question. From Meta to X (formerly Twitter), and including OpenAI and Amazon, these giants now seem to bend under political pressure, sparking a debate about the true nature of their democratic commitment.
This transformation is also expressed through an attitude that fosters misinformation. For instance, the strategic choices of Mark Zuckerberg already reveal a history of compromises with power, notably through a clear reluctance to impose rigorous controls on the virality of information or fact-checking. What may seem like a political turning point actually only uncovers decisions aligned with financial and commercial interests.
Uncertainties about the evolution of tech giants’ policies
Questions arise regarding the behavior of other major companies, such as Google, particularly in connection with how its search engine prioritizes content from traditional media. Concerns are also surfacing about the future of TikTok in the United States. What this dynamic highlights is the emergence of a techno-oligarchy with a pervasive power, influencing not only access to information but also the very quality of public debate and our political life.
In this context, political figures like Joe Biden are worried about the rise of an “oligarchy of ultra-rich” that could pose a serious threat to democracy itself. The major platforms, in their quest for profit, seem to have already weakened democratic foundations.
The promises of freedom of expression: Between reality and hypocrisy
In this climate, Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg position themselves as champions of freedom of expression. Yet, their actions do not corroborate this image. Both X and Meta have, in the past, shown submission to authoritarian regimes, turning a blind eye to imposed censorship to preserve their power and growth.
Musk’s declaration advocating for total freedom of expression does not reflect his actual practice. Indeed, he has restricted access to content that bothered him or criticized the system he operates within, often for the benefit of his own interests. This double discourse raises a fundamental issue regarding the equality of voice granted in a space that aims to be democratic.
A troubling alliance in the American political landscape
The influence of Donald Trump on tech giants, particularly concerning Elon Musk, deserves special attention. Trump has navigated both sides, attracting libertarians while securing the support of those advocating for more protectionist policies. This dynamic, far from being ideological, indicates a common intention to promote misinformation and challenge the laws governing their economic practices.
It is also important to recognize Musk’s significant financial contributions to Trump’s campaign, thereby consolidating a relationship of interdependence that could influence future American elections.
Towards media autonomy in Europe
In light of this situation in the United States, what can the European Union do? The DSA (Digital Services Act) aims to regulate tech giants, but its effectiveness will depend on the willingness to enforce protective measures for citizens. Unfortunately, the inertia in the face of the growing threat from these platforms is concerning.
To restore a certain balance, it is essential for Europe to create its own social media platforms capable of countering the influence of American and Chinese networks. This necessity thrives on preserving a healthy and democratic space for expression, free from harmful content and misinformation.
The question remains whether these platforms can be compelled to act responsibly, especially with figures like Trump potentially in the White House. The legal framework in Europe could promote certain regulations, but its impact will face numerous challenges, particularly regarding the effective enforcement of standards and sanctions. The tech giants represent a complex challenge for the future of democracy, and their ability to evolve within a regulatory environment will be decisive.
